AHA Coding Clinic® for ICD-9 - 2012 Issue 1; Ask the Editor
Maze Procedure via Pericardioscopic Assistance (Convergent Procedure)
The patient is a 61-year-old male who is severely symptomatic with long-standing atrial fibrillation who has now reached chronic persistent atrial fibrillation, symptomatic with dyspnea on exertion and exhaustion. The patient is admitted to undergo a minimally invasive epicardial radiofrequency maze procedure via pericardioscopic assistance (convergent procedure) to treat his persistent atrial fibrillation. A transverse incision was made in the midline to allow digital exploration of the peritoneum. Laparoscopic ports were then passed to the left and right and entered the peritoneal cavity. A large pericardial cannula was introduced into the posterior pericardium. Then a monopolar radiofrequency probe was used to create a series of posterior left atrial lesions extending interior and posterior to the left superior and inferior pulmonary veins. Codes 37.33, Excision or destruction of other lesion or tissue of heart, Open approach; 37.34, Excision or destruction of other lesion or tissue of heart, Endovascular approach; and 37.37, Excision or destruction of other lesion or tissue of heart, Thoracoscopic approach, do not seem appropriate since this procedure appears to be performed laparoscopically. What is the appropriate procedure code assignment for minimally invasive epicardial radiofrequency maze procedure via pericardioscopic assistance? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article reviews a minimally invasive surgical approach used in the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation, with emphasis on the operative context and procedure setup. It is intended for readers who need to understand the general clinical and coding relevance of the convergent approach without exposing the full premium guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Atrial fibrillation procedures can involve multiple operative approaches and code-set considerations, so understanding the clinical context helps coders and clinicians identify the appropriate category of service. The article is relevant to surgical, cardiovascular, and coding professionals working with minimally invasive rhythm-management procedures.
What You Will Learn
- The clinical context for a convergent maze procedure
- How the procedure is described at a high level
- Why the operative approach may be relevant for coding review
- The type of atrial fibrillation scenario addressed in the article
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Cardiothoracic surgery staff
- Cardiology professionals
- Revenue cycle specialists
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com