AHA Coding Clinic® for ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS - 2019 Issue 1; Ask the Editor
Replacement of Left Ventricular Assist Device with Retention of Outflow Graft
The patient presented with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pump thrombus as well as a left ventricular thrombus, and underwent LVAD replacement. At surgery, the patient was placed on cardiopulmonary bypass and redo sternotomy was performed. The outflow graft was clamped/transected and the LVAD was dissected free and explanted from the left ventricular apex. Thrombus was removed and a new LVAD was brought onto the operative field. The inflow conduit of the pump was then connected to the apical connector and secured. The driveline was connected to the driveline-tunneling device and brought through the driveline tunnel. The heart was returned to its native position; excellent seating of the pump was noted. The outflow graft was cut to the appropriate length and anastomosed to the distal remnant of the old LVAD system. The old driveline was transected and the tunnel remnant removed. What is the correct code assignment for replacement of a LVAD when the outflow graft is not replaced? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews a surgical LVAD replacement scenario involving pump thrombus, redo sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and reconstruction of the device components while keeping the outflow graft in place. It is intended for coders and other healthcare revenue cycle professionals who need to distinguish among closely related cardiac device replacement scenarios. The article discusses the operative setup, device handling, and code assignment considerations at a high level without reproducing the premium article’s full guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
LVAD replacement cases can be difficult to code because the operative details determine whether the procedure is treated as a full system replacement or a more limited component-focused revision. Accurate interpretation supports cleaner claims, fewer denials, and more consistent reporting for advanced heart failure surgery.
What You Will Learn
- How an LVAD replacement case is described in an operative context
- Why retained device components matter for coding relevance
- Which general surgical elements are present in this type of procedure note
- How the article frames the coding question for a retained outflow graft scenario
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Revenue cycle staff
- Cardiothoracic surgery coding specialists
- Clinical documentation improvement professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com