AMA CPT® Assistant - 1997 Issue 6 (June)
Coding Clarification (June 1997)
June 1997 page 9 Coding Communication Coding Clarification codingclarification In the April 1997 issue (CPT Assistant. April 1997:4;8), we referred to the use of code 43496 and omitted a specific clarification. Code 43116-52 should be reported when one physician performs the cervical esophag-ectomy and another physician performs the intestinal or jejunal transfer and microvascular anastomosis. Code 43496 would be reported by the physician performing the microvascular procedure. However, if the same physician performs the cervical esophagectomy and the intestinal or jejunal transfer and microvascular anastomosis, then he/she would only report code 43116. In the last sentence of the...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This June 1997 Coding Clarification note from CPT Assistant explains a correction to earlier guidance and focuses on how a surgical case was discussed in relation to physician participation, reporting responsibilities, and a cosurgeon scenario. It is relevant to coding professionals, surgical practices, and billing staff who track CPT Assistant updates and want to understand the scope of the clarification in the context of procedural reporting.
Why This Topic Matters
Articles like this can change how a previously published coding example is understood, so readers need to know when an erratum or clarification affects reporting language in a surgical case. It matters for teams reviewing historical guidance and for those maintaining accurate documentation and claim support.
Article Sections
-
June 1997 page 9
A brief clarification notice tied to a prior CPT Assistant article. It addresses a correction related to physician participation in a surgical case and the reporting context discussed in the earlier publication.
What You Will Learn
- The purpose of a published coding clarification or correction notice
- How the article frames physician participation in a multi-surgeon surgical scenario
- The type of guidance CPT Assistant provides for reviewing prior coding examples
- The general documentation context associated with a corrected reporting discussion
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Billing staff
- Surgical practice administrators
- Physicians involved in operative reporting
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com
