AMA CPT® Assistant - 2014 Issue 11 (November)
Coding Clarification: Special Ophthalmological Services (92133, 92134) (November 2014)
November 2014 page 10 Coding Clarification: Special Ophthalmological Services (92133, 92134) Prior to 2011, CPT code 92135, Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, posterior segment, (eg, scanning laser) with interpretation and report, unilateral, was used to describe a method of objective measurement involving a quantitative determination of the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber. The computer analysis of the measurement data was placed in a database file to allow future comparison of the patient information at follow-up examinations. As ophthalmic diagnostic imaging technology advanced over the years, two new codes 92133, Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, posterior segment, with interpretation...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article clarifies a CPT ophthalmology coding question involving special diagnostic imaging services and the 2011 code revisions. It is aimed at coders, ophthalmology practices, and reimbursement staff who need to understand the scope of the CPT Assistant guidance, the historical context of the deleted and replacement CPT codes, and the general reporting distinctions discussed for retinal imaging and fundus photography.
Why This Topic Matters
Ophthalmology imaging services can be coded differently depending on the type of diagnostic output and the service performed. This clarification helps readers interpret the CPT Assistant guidance in light of code changes and avoid confusion when reviewing special ophthalmologic diagnostic imaging documentation.
Article Sections
-
Historical background and 2011 CPT changes
Summarizes the evolution of the ophthalmic diagnostic imaging codes and the reason the article addresses later reporting clarification. It also notes the broader context of the code revisions described in the CPT Assistant discussion.
-
April 1999 CPT Assistant question and answer
Reviews the earlier published question-and-answer format that prompted the clarification. The section provides the background for understanding how the article frames scanning laser fundus photography in relation to special ophthalmological services.
-
Revised reporting clarification
Presents the updated guidance discussed by the article regarding the type of imaging and data involved in these ophthalmic services. It explains why the clarification was needed and how the revised answer is framed.
-
Rationale for the parenthetical note and descriptor changes
Describes the reasoning behind the note associated with the updated codes and the changes made when the former code was divided into separate services. It also mentions the descriptor wording update discussed in the article.
-
Closing note on fundus photography without quantitative analysis
Restates the article’s final emphasis on the general distinction between a photographic service and a more data-driven diagnostic imaging service. This section reinforces the closing clarification provided in the source text.
What You Will Learn
- The historical context for changes to special ophthalmological diagnostic imaging codes.
- Why the article revisits an older CPT Assistant question about scanning laser fundus photography.
- The general categories of information used to distinguish different ophthalmic imaging services.
- The rationale discussed for revised code structure and related parenthetical guidance.
- The scope of the clarification regarding fundus photography and quantitative diagnostic analysis.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Ophthalmology billing staff
- Revenue cycle specialists
- Compliance staff
- Physician practices
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com