AMA CPT® Assistant - 1996 Issue 12 (December)
Integumentary, 17100-17104 (Q&A) (December 1996)
December 1996 page 10g Coding Consultation Integumentary, 17100-17104 (Q&A) Question We would like clarification on the use of the destruction series 17100 - 17104 . We are destroying 15 lesions. When reporting these services, should we report the codes cumulatively (reporting each code together to represent the number of destructions performed), or should we report only one code, to describe the number of lesions destroyed? AMA Comment From a CPT coding perspective, when 15 or more benign or premalignant lesions are destroyed, it would be appropriate to report code 17104 alone, since this code represents 15 lesions and anything...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article is a short CPT coding consultation focused on the integumentary destruction code series and a question about reporting lesion destruction counts. It is useful for coders, auditors, and billing staff who work with CPT procedure reporting and want to understand the scope of guidance discussed in the Q&A. The article presents a coding question and an AMA comment within a concise, single-topic format.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers determine whether the article addresses reporting of integumentary lesion destruction services and whether the discussion is relevant to CPT coding workflows and documentation review.
Article Sections
-
December 1996 page 10g
Publication information and the coding consultation context for a CPT Q&A item.
-
Coding Consultation
Introductory material identifying the topic area and consultation format.
-
Question
A coding question about the integumentary destruction series and how multiple lesions should be represented in reporting.
-
AMA Comment
The response section from AMA discussing the CPT perspective on the reported service count.
What You Will Learn
- The article addresses a CPT coding question about integumentary destruction services.
- The article explains the scope of the destruction series discussed in the Q&A format.
- The article shows how an AMA comment is presented in a coding consultation piece.
- The article highlights how lesion-count reporting is discussed within a CPT guidance context.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Billing staff
- Compliance reviewers
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.



Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com