AMA CPT® Assistant - 1997 Issue 9 (September)
Integumentary System, 12031, 13100, 13131, 13150 (Q&A) (September 1997)
September 1997 page 11a Coding Consultation Integumentary System, 12031, 13100, 13131, 13150 (Q&A) Question When reporting codes for repair of intermediate or complex wounds after the removal of lesions, should we measure the total length of the repaired defect or the size of the lesion? AMA Comment From a CPT coding perspective, when reporting codes for repair of intermediate and complex wounds after the removal of lesions, you should measure the total length of repaired defects, not the size of the lesions. For example, if a patient has two lesions removed and the length of one closure site...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article is a short CPT coding consultation from CPT Assistant that focuses on wound repair reporting after lesion removal. It is aimed at medical coders and billing staff who work with integumentary system procedures and need to understand the general topic covered in the Q&A and accompanying AMA commentary.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers decide whether the article is relevant to postoperative wound repair coding questions in the integumentary system and indicates that the discussion is framed around CPT guidance from the late 1990s.
Article Sections
-
September 1997 page 11a
A brief CPT coding consultation Q&A from CPT Assistant discussing wound repair reporting in the integumentary system.
What You Will Learn
- The general topic of coding consultation for integumentary system wound repair.
- That the article addresses reporting questions related to lesion removal and closure repair.
- How the article is framed within a CPT Assistant Q&A format.
- The publication context and timeframe of the guidance.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Billing staff
- Compliance teams
- Physician practice staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.



Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com