AMA CPT® Assistant - 2004 Issue 12 (December)
Modifier 25: Making the Right Decisions, Part II (December 2004)
December 2004 pages 1-5 Modifier 25: Making the Right Decisions, Part II In Part I of this series featured within the November 2004 issue of CPT Assistant , the essential guidelines for using modifier 25 were explained. Part II concludes the series with an explanation of the key provisions of modifier 57 to distinguish it from modifier 25. Also included is an explanation of how the 2004 deletion of the starred procedure designation affects the use of both modifiers and a concise reference guide for modifiers 25 and 57. Distinguishing Between Modifier 25 and 57 Both modifiers 25 and 57...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This CPT Assistant article is the second part of a series on evaluation and management reporting in relation to surgical procedures. It focuses on the distinction between modifier 25 and modifier 57, discusses the CPT 2004 change that removed the starred procedure designation, and outlines how payer policies and Medicare/global surgery guidance can affect reporting. It is aimed at coders, billers, and compliance staff who need to compare CPT and payer requirements for same-day E/M and procedural services.
Why This Topic Matters
The article helps readers understand a policy area where payer rules may differ and where CPT changes affected longstanding reporting practices. It is relevant for avoiding inconsistent application of modifier guidance and for recognizing when additional payer verification is needed.
Article Sections
-
December 2004 pages 1-5
Publication context and the scope of the article series are introduced.
-
Distinguishing Between Modifier 25 and 57
The article compares the two modifiers at a high level and frames how their general purposes differ in the reporting of evaluation and management services.
-
Modifier 57: Decision for Surgery
General guidance is presented on the modifier’s relationship to evaluation and management services and surgical decision-making, including references to payer coverage considerations.
-
AMA Guidelines
This section summarizes the AMA perspective and notes documentation and reporting considerations tied to the modifier.
-
CMS Guidelines
Medicare-oriented guidance is summarized, including the relationship to major surgery and global surgery policy.
-
Third-Party Payer Guidelines
The article discusses how non-Medicare payer policies may vary and why payer-specific review can matter.
-
Starred Procedure Designation
This section reviews the historical starred procedure concept and explains that it was deleted in CPT 2004.
-
Endnote
A citation supporting the article’s background discussion is provided.
-
Reference Guide to the Use of Modifiers 25 and 57
A concise comparison table summarizes the two modifiers and highlights broad Medicare exceptions and payer acceptance context.
What You Will Learn
- How modifier 57 is positioned relative to modifier 25
- What types of guidance are discussed for CPT and Medicare policy review
- How the CPT 2004 deletion of the starred procedure designation affected reporting context
- Why payer-specific rules remain important when reviewing same-day E/M and procedure reporting
- What broad topics are included in the reference guide comparing the two modifiers
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing professionals
- Compliance staff
- Physician practice managers
- Revenue cycle teams
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com
