AMA CPT® Assistant - 2006 Issue 9 (September)
Special Otorhinolaryngologic Services (September 2006)
September 2006 page 13 Coding Communication: Special Otorhinolaryngologic Services The following coding communication is provided in response to a previously published question and AMA comment that appeared in the November 2004 CPT Assistant (page 10) that addressed codes 92543 and 92700 with respect to air and water calorics. Question Can my client report code 92543 if he uses air instead of water, or is there another more appropriate code to use? AMA Comment Code 92543 , Caloric vestibular test, each irrigation (binaural, bithermal stimulation constitutes four tests), with recording , specifically describes irrigation (ie, use of water). Therefore, it would not...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article presents an AMA/CPT Assistant coding communication focused on special otorhinolaryngologic services. It explains that the discussion centers on caloric vestibular testing, the distinction between earlier and newly clarified AMA commentary, and the broader context of coding guidance for auditory/vestibular procedures. It is relevant to coders, audiology and ENT practices, and professionals following CPT clarifications and updates.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand that the article updates prior CPT Assistant guidance and is aimed at resolving coding questions around a specific otorhinolaryngologic test modality.
Article Sections
-
Coding Communication: Special Otorhinolaryngologic Services
Introductory coding communication identifying the topic, source publication, and the coding question addressed in the article.
-
Question
The coding question presented for review, focused on reporting guidance for a vestibular testing scenario.
-
AMA Comment
The earlier AMA commentary cited in the article, providing context for the discussion and the prior published position.
-
Newly Clarified AMA Comment
The updated AMA commentary that clarifies the subject matter and indicates that it supersedes the earlier published comment.
What You Will Learn
- The general subject matter of the CPT Assistant clarification.
- How the article frames an update to previously published AMA commentary.
- What type of otorhinolaryngologic service discussion the article addresses.
- The professional context in which the coding communication appears.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- ENT/otolaryngology practices
- Audiology professionals
- Billing and compliance staff
- Clinical documentation specialists
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com