AMA CPT® Assistant - 2012 Issue 3 (March)
Surgery: Eye and Ocular Adnexa (Q&A) (March 2012)
March 2012 page 9a Surgery: Eye and Ocular Adnexa Question: How should the following be reported? A patient had a nonclearing vitreous hemorrhage and a tractional retinal detachment. There was no mention of diabetes. Three 23G trocar cannulas were introduced 3.5 mm posterior to the limbus for a standard vitrectomy. The core vitrectomy was carried out with a microvitrector. Tractional elements were removed, and the scleral depression revealed no peripheral tears. An endolaser was applied to all four quadrants, and the instruments were removed from the eyes with no wound leakage. Tractional elements were not specified as epiretinal...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article presents a March 2012 ophthalmic surgery question-and-answer item focused on how a retinal detachment repair case is reported. It is intended for coding professionals and billers working with eye and ocular adnexa procedures who need to understand the scope of the guidance and the code set involved.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers identify whether a specific vitreoretinal surgery scenario falls within the article’s coding discussion and confirms the CPT context of the guidance.
What You Will Learn
- The general topic of the ophthalmic surgery coding scenario
- How the article frames reporting guidance for a retinal detachment repair case
- The CPT context used in the discussion
- What type of surgical case the Q&A addresses
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Ophthalmology billing staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.



Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com