AMA CPT® Assistant - 1996 Issue 5 (May)
Urinary System, 52320, 52332, 52339 (Q&A) (May 1996)
May 1996 page 11-end Coding Consultation Urinary System, 52320, 52332, 52339 (Q&A) Question In the March 1996 CPT Assistant, in the article entitled, Cystourethroscopic Ureteral Stent: Insertion and Removal, on page 3 you state that 52332 can be billed as a multiple procedure with codes 52320-52330, but page 191 in the CPT book states that insertion of a stent is included in procedures 52320-52339 and should not be reported separately. Which method is correct? AMA Comment As stated in the first paragraph on page 2 of that same article, you are correct that the existing explanatory note states...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses a CPT Assistant coding question involving urinary system endoscopic procedures, ureteral stent placement, and a later editorial clarification from the CPT Editorial Panel. It is relevant to coders, compliance staff, and clinicians who work with CPT guidance for urinary tract procedures and need to understand the scope of the discussion in this historical coding update.
Why This Topic Matters
The piece explains a coding-related clarification that affects how urinary system procedure reporting was being interpreted at the time, including references to CPT editorial language and modifier guidance. It helps readers determine whether the article is the right source for understanding the historical discussion around this family of procedures and related documentation issues.
Article Sections
-
May 1996 page 11-end
A brief article header and coding consultation context for a question-and-answer discussion focused on urinary system CPT guidance.
-
Question
The coding question asks about an apparent inconsistency between a CPT Assistant discussion and explanatory note language in the CPT book.
-
AMA Comment
The response provides the AMA’s clarification of the issue and notes a CPT Editorial Panel update for a later edition of CPT.
What You Will Learn
- The article’s focus within urinary system CPT guidance.
- How the discussion is framed as a question-and-answer coding consultation.
- That the piece includes an AMA clarification and references a later editorial revision.
- The general type of modifier and stent-reporting guidance addressed by the article.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Compliance professionals
- Billing staff
- Urology practices
- Physician documentation staff
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com
