Is it appropriate to report code 33208, Insertion of new or replacement of permanent pacemaker

CPT® Knowledge Base is a compendium of real life coding questions asked by the coding community and answered by CPT® coding experts.

Over 2900 questions and authoritative answers from the CPT® professionals at the AMA. Get specific answers to challenging coding questions, and search the knowledge base of others' real world questions.

Access to this feature is available in the following products:

AMA's CPT® Advanced Coding Pack

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

Would it be appropriate to report codes 33206-33208 (REVISED IN 2012), Insertion of new or (2015)
Eight days following the insertion of a permanent pacemaker with transvenous atrial and ventricular leads (2015)
Would it be appropriate to report code 33225 for the insertion of a transvenous lead (2025)
What is the appropriate CPT code to report when a pacemaker is upgraded from a (2016)
I have been searching for the appropriate CPT code to report the insertion of a (2015)
If the second lead of a pacemaker is included in the bundle of His, is (2022)
Is it appropriate to report code 93644 in conjunction with code 33270 at the time (2024)
When a patient has both atrial and ventricular cardiac electrodes repositioned how should this be (2015)
Would it be appropriate to report the in-person device evaluation codes 93260 or 93261 with (2024)
Which CPT code should be reported for the creation of a pocket for a pulse (2015)
Would the programming or reprogramming of dual or single chamber pacemakers, at the time of (2015)
May the removal of a permanent pacemaker system (generator and electrode[s]) be additionally reported when (2015)

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

MY NEWSLETTERS

FEES

FACILITY

RISK ADJUSTMENT

AMA CPT® Knowledge Base - Sep 3, 2026

Article Overview

Why This Topic Matters

What You Will Learn

Who Should Read This

Codes Discussed

Related Articles