Is it appropriate to report code 38220 , Bone marrow; aspiration only, with the use of units? The units in this example would be insertion of a needle at separate sites or moving the needle within the same incision/ insertion site to obtain multiple aspirations. ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This brief coding guidance article addresses CPT billing questions related to bone marrow aspiration procedures and the reporting of multiple aspirations. It is aimed at coders, billers, and clinical documentation staff who need to understand when site distinctions and documentation support may affect claim reporting. The article focuses on general CPT guidance, the role of supporting medical record documentation, and related use of modifier reporting in this context.
Why This Topic Matters
Correct reporting for repeated aspiration activity can affect claim accuracy, documentation support, and consistency in procedural coding workflows. The topic is relevant for organizations that code bone marrow procedures and want to distinguish between repeated work at one site and work performed at separate sites.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames CPT reporting questions for bone marrow aspiration procedures.
- How documentation supports reporting when aspiration occurs at more than one site.
- What broad factors the article discusses when considering repeated aspiration activity.
- How the article relates general procedural reporting to modifier use in this context.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Clinical documentation improvement staff
- Hematology/oncology coding personnel
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com