How should code 96110 (REVISED IN 2012 AND 2015), Developmental testing; limited (i.e., Developmental Screening Test II, Early Language Milestone Screen), with interpretation and report, be reported? Does the Denver II qualify as an instrument? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium coding article addresses documentation and reporting considerations for developmental screening services, with emphasis on what constitutes a qualifying instrument and how practitioner-performed testing factors into reporting. It is intended for coders, billing staff, and clinicians who need to understand the article’s guidance on developmental testing documentation and related coding compliance topics.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate reporting of developmental screening services depends on documentation standards and the use of an appropriate scored instrument. The article helps readers understand the scope of those requirements and whether a specific screening tool fits within that framework.
What You Will Learn
- What general documentation elements are associated with developmental screening reporting
- How a scored screening instrument factors into developmental testing documentation
- Why practitioner-performed testing is relevant to reporting considerations
- How the article frames the use of a specific developmental screening tool in relation to the service
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing personnel
- Physicians
- Clinical staff involved in developmental screening
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com