When magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) code 70551 , magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) code 70544 , and magnetic resonance venography (MRV) code 70544 , are performed on the same anatomic region (eg, head) can all three procedures be reported separately for the professional and technical component if the physician performs a separate interpretation and report for each? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This short coding guidance article discusses combined magnetic resonance imaging and vascular imaging studies performed on the same anatomic area, with emphasis on whether separate reporting is appropriate when multiple interpretations are performed. It is intended for coders, billers, and radiology practices seeking to understand general reimbursement and payer policy considerations for these imaging services.
Why This Topic Matters
Imaging studies performed during the same session can create reporting and reimbursement questions, especially when professional and technical components, payer policies, and contractor interpretations differ. Understanding the article’s scope helps practices determine whether the full guidance is relevant to their MRI and angiographic imaging billing workflow.
What You Will Learn
- The general reporting question raised when MRI, MRA, and MRV are performed on the same anatomic region
- How payer policy and contractor interpretation may affect reporting decisions for same-session imaging studies
- Why medical necessity considerations may vary across payers for these imaging services
- The general context for separate interpretation and reporting questions in radiology billing
Who Should Read This
- Radiology coders
- Medical billers
- Revenue cycle staff
- Radiology practices
- Compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com