Two stones were located, one in the upper right ureter and another in the pelvis of the right (same side) kidney. A cystourethroscopy and ureteroscopy with lithotripsy of both stones was performed and the fragments removed. Following this, an indwelling stent was inserted. Would it be appropriate to report both codes 52356 and 52353 , because two procedures were performed for stones in two different sites? ...
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses a urology coding question about how to report a procedure involving stones in more than one location on the same side, along with ureteroscopic treatment and stent placement. It is aimed at coders, billing staff, and compliance professionals who need to understand how the article frames the relationship among CPT procedures, related parenthetical guidance, and modifier use in this type of scenario.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate reporting in stone-treatment cases depends on understanding which CPT services are bundled, when separate reporting is not appropriate, and when an additional modifier may be considered. This matters for correct claim submission, compliance, and avoiding duplicate reporting.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames coding for a multi-stone urologic procedure scenario
- What type of CPT guidance is discussed in relation to ureteroscopy, lithotripsy, and stent placement
- When the article says an additional modifier may be considered in a more extensive case
- How the article positions same-side procedural reporting questions in a urology context
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing specialists
- Compliance staff
- Urology coding professionals
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com