A woman presents with a suspicious mass detected by mammography. A smart tag (same size and replacement for a traditional clip) was placed percutaneously in the lesion at the time of biopsy. The biopsy has confirmed an atypia, neoplasm, or benign mass requiring excision. She undergoes surgical excision of the mass. During the lumpectomy, a surgical detector system guides the surgeon to the smart tag placed at the time of biopsy, providing audible and directional feedback, as well as distance information. The surgeon removes the mass, margins, and smart clip. Is 19302 the appropriate code to report for the lumpectomy? ...

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Sign In Subscribe Today

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by the AMA. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article reviews a breast surgery coding scenario involving a suspicious mammographic finding, placement of a smart tag at biopsy, and subsequent surgical excision using a detector system. It is relevant to coders working with breast procedures, surgical oncology, and outpatient surgical documentation because it addresses how the reported service is framed in coding terms. The discussion focuses on general coding interpretation for lumpectomy-type procedures and the documentation elements that affect code selection.

Why This Topic Matters

Breast excision procedures are commonly documented in ways that can affect code reporting, especially when localization devices and multiple operative components are involved. Understanding the scope of the service helps coders match the documented procedure to the correct breast surgery code family without overreporting additional services not supported by the record.

Codes Discussed

• CPT: 19302
• CPT: 19301

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Sign In Subscribe Today