BC Advantage - 2017 Issue 7
The QPP in 2018: Fun with NPRM Numbers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews selected figures from CMS’s 2018 Quality Payment Program notice of proposed rulemaking and explains why those estimates matter to clinicians, especially those in nephrology and small practices. It focuses on broad policy areas such as MIPS participation, low-volume thresholds, Advanced APM eligibility, nominal risk standards, and projected program costs and payments.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand how CMS’s proposed 2018 QPP changes could affect clinician participation, payment flow, and the practical impact on specialty practices. The piece is most relevant for clinicians, practice leaders, and coding or reimbursement professionals following Medicare quality payment policy.
Article Sections
-
Low-volume threshold
Discusses proposed changes to the MIPS low-volume threshold and the potential effect on smaller and rural practices. It frames the issue in terms of estimated participation impacts and specialty relevance.
-
Advanced APMs
Covers projected changes in Advanced APM participation and the factors that may expand qualifying participant numbers. It references broader model availability and updates affecting participation pathways.
-
Nominal risk
Reviews the proposed standards related to financial risk in Advanced APMs. The section explains the topic at a high level and references the policy framework CMS uses in the proposal.
-
The butcher’s bill
Summarizes CMS’s projected cost and budget-impact estimates tied to MIPS and Advanced APM participation. It focuses on the overall financial scale of the proposed rule.
-
Put those shoes back on
Provides a concluding discussion about expected future growth in qualifying participants and the broader financial movement within the QPP. It closes with a general reflection on the proposed rule’s implications.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS’s 2018 QPP proposal frames participation thresholds and exclusions
- What broad changes are discussed for Advanced APM participation pathways
- How the article characterizes the proposal’s treatment of nominal risk
- What kinds of cost and payment impact estimates are associated with the proposed rule
- Why the article views the proposal as relevant to nephrology and other small practices
Who Should Read This
- Physicians participating in Medicare quality programs
- Nephrology practices and specialty groups
- Practice administrators
- Medical coders and reimbursement staff
- Healthcare policy analysts
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com