The QPP in 2018: Fun with NPRM Numbers

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by BC Advantage. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article reviews selected figures from CMS’s 2018 Quality Payment Program notice of proposed rulemaking and explains why those estimates matter to clinicians, especially those in nephrology and small practices. It focuses on broad policy areas such as MIPS participation, low-volume thresholds, Advanced APM eligibility, nominal risk standards, and projected program costs and payments.

Why This Topic Matters

It helps readers understand how CMS’s proposed 2018 QPP changes could affect clinician participation, payment flow, and the practical impact on specialty practices. The piece is most relevant for clinicians, practice leaders, and coding or reimbursement professionals following Medicare quality payment policy.

Article Sections

  1. Low-volume threshold

    Discusses proposed changes to the MIPS low-volume threshold and the potential effect on smaller and rural practices. It frames the issue in terms of estimated participation impacts and specialty relevance.

  2. Advanced APMs

    Covers projected changes in Advanced APM participation and the factors that may expand qualifying participant numbers. It references broader model availability and updates affecting participation pathways.

  3. Nominal risk

    Reviews the proposed standards related to financial risk in Advanced APMs. The section explains the topic at a high level and references the policy framework CMS uses in the proposal.

  4. The butcher’s bill

    Summarizes CMS’s projected cost and budget-impact estimates tied to MIPS and Advanced APM participation. It focuses on the overall financial scale of the proposed rule.

  5. Put those shoes back on

    Provides a concluding discussion about expected future growth in qualifying participants and the broader financial movement within the QPP. It closes with a general reflection on the proposed rule’s implications.

What You Will Learn

  • How CMS’s 2018 QPP proposal frames participation thresholds and exclusions
  • What broad changes are discussed for Advanced APM participation pathways
  • How the article characterizes the proposal’s treatment of nominal risk
  • What kinds of cost and payment impact estimates are associated with the proposed rule
  • Why the article views the proposal as relevant to nephrology and other small practices

Who Should Read This

  • Physicians participating in Medicare quality programs
  • Nephrology practices and specialty groups
  • Practice administrators
  • Medical coders and reimbursement staff
  • Healthcare policy analysts

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • BC Advantage, 30+ CEUs & Webinars

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?