decisionhealth Newsletters, Answer Books - 2008 Issue 7 (July)
Answer_Book / Concurrent_Care / o
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how concurrent care claims are reviewed when multiple practitioners treat the same patient on the same day, and why Medicare specialty and subspecialty information can affect carrier processing. It also covers practitioner specialty reporting through CMS enrollment forms and the use of specialty taxonomy codes in carrier records. The content is relevant to billing staff, coders, and provider enrollment personnel who manage specialty identification and claim denial issues.
Why This Topic Matters
Concurrent care denials can occur when carrier records do not reflect the correct specialty or subspecialty. Understanding the Medicare specialty taxonomy crosswalk and practitioner specialty reporting helps support accurate claim handling and enrollment maintenance.
Article Sections
-
Concurrent care and claim denials
Introduces concurrent care as a claim review issue and describes how carrier denials may arise when multiple practitioners are involved. Discusses the role of specialty recognition in that review process.
-
Medicare specialty taxonomy crosswalk
Explains that Medicare uses a specialty and subspecialty list to help carriers evaluate whether concurrent care is appropriate. References where the list is located within the chapter.
-
Carrier screening and inpatient services
Addresses carrier screening practices for inpatient claims and notes the types of services that are excluded from such screens. Focuses on general claim-processing oversight rather than detailed coding rules.
-
Updating specialty status with the carrier
Describes contacting carrier provider services to confirm that specialty information has been updated. The section centers on maintaining accurate provider records to support claim processing.
-
Example of subspecialty identification
Provides an illustrative scenario involving two physicians in different areas of practice to show how specialty records can affect claim handling. The example is used to demonstrate the importance of accurate specialty classification.
-
CMS-855 specialty reporting
Notes where physicians and non-physician practitioners report specialty changes on the CMS enrollment form. Focuses on the administrative process for updating practitioner identification information.
-
Specialty code selection and UPIN records
Discusses specialty code reporting in relation to practice mix and carrier records. Also addresses requirements for physicians with a unique personal identification number and the need for a valid specialty code.
What You Will Learn
- How concurrent care claim issues are described in the context of Medicare carrier review
- Why specialty and subspecialty information matters for claim processing
- Where practitioner specialty changes are reported in CMS enrollment materials
- How carrier records and specialty taxonomy crosswalks relate to provider identification
- What kinds of administrative issues can affect concurrent care denials
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Provider enrollment staff
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Physician office managers
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com