decisionhealth Newsletters, Answer Books - 2010 Issue 1 (January)
Answer_Book / Quality_Reporting_Initiatives / Data registry reporting
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains the basics of reporting quality measures through a CMS-approved registry under PQRI. It is relevant to providers, individual practitioners, and coding or quality reporting staff who want a high-level understanding of how registry-based reporting works, what to verify before enrolling, and how CMS-approved registries fit into the broader quality reporting process.
Why This Topic Matters
Registry-based reporting can affect how quality data are collected, submitted, and validated for CMS programs. Understanding the general process helps providers evaluate participation options and confirm whether a registry is suitable for their reporting needs.
Article Sections
-
Data registry reporting
Introduces registry-based reporting for quality measures and outlines general considerations for participating providers.
-
Questions and answers on PQRI via registry
Provides a high-level Q&A overview of registry participation, selection, approval status, and submission expectations under PQRI.
What You Will Learn
- What registry-based quality reporting is at a high level
- What to consider before joining a CMS-approved registry
- How registry participation is generally structured
- How CMS approval status affects registry reporting
- What kinds of verification are needed before selecting a registry
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Non-physician practitioners
- Quality reporting staff
- Medical coders
- Practice administrators
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com