decisionhealth Newsletters, Answer Books - 2009 Issue 3 (March)
Anti-Kickback Advisory Opinion Summaries / 1998 OIG Advisory Opinions / Opinion 98-01 - OIG Turns Thumbs Down on Elaborate HME Marketing
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews a 1998 OIG advisory opinion concerning a proposed arrangement involving a home medical equipment manufacturer, a marketing company, physician-facing distribution, training payments, and loaned equipment. It explains why the arrangement raised anti-kickback concerns and why the proposal did not appear to fit available safe harbor protection. The piece is relevant to compliance, reimbursement, and HME stakeholders who need to understand how marketing structures can trigger fraud-and-abuse scrutiny and claims filing concerns.
Why This Topic Matters
Healthcare organizations, suppliers, marketers, and compliance staff can use this summary to gauge whether the full advisory opinion is relevant to their business arrangements. It highlights the types of contractual and operational features that drew OIG scrutiny without disclosing the full opinion analysis.
Article Sections
-
Proposed arrangement and OIG review
Introduces the parties, the proposed business structure, and the advisory opinion request. Summarizes the overall context of the OIG review.
-
Marketing arrangement and compensation structure
Describes the general marketing and billing relationship between the parties. Covers the compensation structure and the related compliance concerns discussed in the article.
-
Training payments and loaned equipment
Summarizes the separate training component and the equipment placement concept discussed in the proposal. Notes the article’s focus on how these features raised broader fraud-and-abuse and claims-related questions.
-
OIG concerns and safe harbor analysis
Explains the broad categories of issues OIG identified in the arrangement. Addresses the article’s discussion of why the proposal did not appear to fall within regulatory protection.
-
Claims filing and coding concerns
Highlights the article’s mention of additional concerns tied to claims filing and coding. Keeps the focus on the general compliance implications rather than specific code guidance.
What You Will Learn
- How an OIG advisory opinion can evaluate a proposed marketing arrangement involving home medical equipment.
- What broad compliance themes can arise from compensation, referrals, training, and loaned equipment.
- Why certain business structures may raise anti-kickback and claims-related concerns.
- How advisory opinions can signal risk areas for suppliers, marketers, and compliance teams.
Who Should Read This
- Healthcare compliance professionals
- Home medical equipment suppliers
- Medical device and orthotics marketers
- Revenue cycle and reimbursement staff
- Healthcare attorneys
- Physician practice administrators
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com