decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2010 Issue 2 (February)
Benchmark of the Week: Top 12 codes billed and denied by specialty in 2008
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews Medicare claims data for 2008 and highlights high-utilization, high-denial billing patterns across the specialties that submit the most claims. It is designed for coding and compliance professionals who want to understand which specialties and service categories are experiencing denial pressure, how those patterns compare with earlier CMS data, and what broad types of denial drivers are being discussed. The piece focuses on benchmark trends, specialty comparisons, and general denial themes rather than detailed coding guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps coders, compliance staff, and practice administrators spot broad denial trends in Medicare billing and compare specialty-level performance against prior years. That context can support internal audits, education, and denial-management review.
Article Sections
-
Overview
Introduces the Medicare claims benchmark and explains that the article compares high-use, high-denial billing patterns across major specialties. It also notes the time period and the use of prior-year CMS data for context.
-
Methodology and exclusions
Summarizes how the featured codes were selected and which categories were omitted from analysis. The section explains the broad criteria used to focus the benchmark on heavily billed, higher-denial services.
-
Breakdown
Discusses specialty-level denial patterns and broad trend observations from the CMS data. It highlights how denial rates varied across selected services and specialties over the comparison period.
-
Takeaways
Reviews the general denial themes associated with the benchmark results and points to broad causes discussed in the article. It places the findings in the context of Medicare claims data and related payment policy changes.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames Medicare denial trends by specialty
- What kinds of high-volume services were included in the benchmark analysis
- How prior-year CMS data is used to provide comparison context
- What broad denial themes are associated with the featured benchmark results
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Practice managers
- Revenue cycle staff
- Specialty billing teams
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com