decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2007 Issue 2 (February)
Cancer's excised, treatment's ended: Use “history of” dx
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers ICD-9-CM guidance on documenting and coding a past cancer after excision or eradication, with emphasis on when a personal history code is appropriate versus an active malignancy code. It is relevant to coders, billers, physicians, and compliance staff who work with oncology follow-up visits, post-operative care, and diagnosis selection. The article also discusses the difference between clinical thinking and coding rules, the role of supporting documentation, and the importance of avoiding inappropriate labeling of patients in claims and records.
Why This Topic Matters
Correctly distinguishing a resolved malignancy from an active one affects claim accuracy, compliance, and how a patient’s medical history is represented to payers and other stakeholders.
What You Will Learn
- How ICD-9-CM distinguishes a resolved malignancy from an active cancer diagnosis
- When a personal history code may be appropriate in follow-up care
- Why documentation context matters when selecting a diagnosis for a visit
- How coding choices can affect claims processing and patient record labeling
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Medical billers
- Physician practices
- Compliance staff
- Oncology and surgical billing teams
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com