decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2005 Issue 5 (May)
Carriers vary on biofeedback, but all require failed PME first
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how different carriers approach coverage for biofeedback therapy, especially when it is used for incontinence. It is aimed at coding and reimbursement professionals who need to understand the general policy landscape, the distinction between the CPT services discussed, and the ICD-9 diagnosis references commonly tied to payer medical necessity review. The piece also summarizes why prior failed pelvic muscle exercise therapy matters in coverage decisions and notes that payer policies may differ by diagnosis category and jurisdiction.
Why This Topic Matters
Coverage for biofeedback is often payer-specific, so coding staff need to know which therapy settings are discussed, which diagnosis groups are referenced, and how medical necessity is framed in policy language. The article helps readers recognize where carrier policies may differ and what background guidance is associated with this topic.
What You Will Learn
- How payer policies can vary for biofeedback therapy
- Which general CPT services are discussed in relation to biofeedback
- How coverage is tied to incontinence-related medical necessity review
- What diagnosis categories are commonly referenced by carriers
- Why prior conservative therapy is relevant in biofeedback coverage discussions
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Billing staff
- Reimbursement specialists
- Practice managers
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com