decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2001 Issue 9 (September)
Clearer advice given for billing for diagnostic test
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains CMS’s national policy guidance for billing and reporting diagnostic test interpretations under ICD-9-CM. It is useful for physicians, radiologists, and billing/coding staff who need to understand how CMS wants diagnostic-test claims documented, including screening scenarios, specificity expectations, incidental findings, and what counts as an acceptable order for testing.
Why This Topic Matters
The guidance affects how Medicare claims are coded and documented for diagnostic test interpretation, so it is relevant to compliance and claim accuracy across specialties that read or bill for tests.
Article Sections
-
Policy update for diagnostic test interpretation
Introduces the CMS memorandum and the broader national scope of the guidance. It frames the article around billing and diagnosis reporting for interpreted diagnostic tests.
-
Screening tests
Covers CMS guidance for tests ordered without signs or symptoms and the general treatment of screening-related reporting. It also notes that test findings may be recorded separately in appropriate situations.
-
Coding to the greatest degree of specificity
Summarizes CMS direction on using the most accurate and specific diagnosis code available within ICD-9-CM. The section includes an example illustrating the general specificity concept.
-
Incidental findings
Describes how CMS addresses findings that are not the reason for the test. It explains the general handling of incidental results in the context of the interpreting physician’s report.
-
Orders for tests
Explains CMS documentation expectations for test orders communicated through different channels. It also addresses what information may be used when the reason for testing is not immediately available.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS frames reporting for interpreted diagnostic tests
- How screening situations are discussed in the guidance
- How the article presents specificity expectations for diagnosis reporting
- How incidental findings are treated in the policy memo
- What forms of test orders are recognized in the guidance
Who Should Read This
- Physicians who interpret diagnostic tests
- Referring physicians
- Radiologists and other specialists
- Medical coders and billing staff
- Compliance and revenue cycle personnel
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com