decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2007 Issue 10 (October)
CMS nod to ICD-10 could mean change is in the air
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers CMS’s decision to contract with AHIMA to study the potential transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 and to help develop an implementation plan and training approach. It explains why the topic matters to physicians, hospitals, payers, and health information management organizations, with attention to claims processing, data specificity, payment system implications, and cost concerns.
Why This Topic Matters
The article signals possible movement toward a major diagnosis coding transition that would affect clinical documentation, claims workflows, training, and health data reporting across the healthcare system.
Article Sections
-
CMS contract and transition study
Discusses CMS’s agreement with AHIMA to examine the operational impact of a potential diagnosis code system transition and to support planning activities.
-
Arguments for and against the move
Summarizes viewpoints from physician groups, health information management leaders, and policymakers on the broader implications of a transition in coding systems.
-
Implementation concerns and next steps
Covers concerns about training, technology, infrastructure, claims processing, and the need for stakeholders to begin planning for possible changes.
What You Will Learn
- What CMS is studying regarding the diagnosis coding transition
- Which stakeholder groups are discussing the potential impact
- What broad operational areas are expected to be affected
- Why the change is being considered significant for claims and health data
- What kinds of implementation concerns are being raised
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding managers
- Physician practice administrators
- Health information management professionals
- Revenue cycle staff
- Healthcare policy readers
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com