CMS proposed rule delaying ICD-10 will require more claims testing

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article explains a CMS proposed rule that would affect the electronic claims submission process during the ICD-10 delay period. It focuses on upcoming changes for health plans, clearinghouses, and related entities, including the need for additional claims testing, staff preparation, and awareness of implementation timing. The piece is aimed at providers, billing staff, and others who work with payer transactions and standard electronic claims formats.

Why This Topic Matters

The proposed rule could change how claims are routed and processed, creating operational and testing requirements for organizations that submit or handle electronic transactions. Understanding the scope of the rule helps practices prepare for possible disruptions and align internal workflows with new payer identification standards.

Article Sections

  1. Overview of the proposed rule

    Summarizes the CMS proposal and its connection to the ICD-10 delay. Introduces the impact on electronic claims submission and preparation needs.

  2. Standardized identifiers for health plans and related entities

    Describes the move toward standardized identifiers in standard transactions and the general operational issues CMS says it is trying to address.

  3. Implementation timing and testing expectations

    Covers the proposed compliance dates for different plan sizes and the need for staff training and claims testing before implementation.

  4. Example of a transaction change

    Presents a sample transaction field change included in the proposed rule to illustrate the type of claims-submission update discussed in the article.

  5. Affected organizations and comment period

    Lists the categories of organizations impacted by the proposal and notes the public comment period and submission process.

What You Will Learn

  • What the CMS proposed rule is addressing at a high level
  • Which kinds of organizations may be affected by the proposed transaction changes
  • Why additional claims testing may be needed before implementation
  • What types of administrative simplification changes are being discussed
  • How the proposal relates to electronic claims submission workflows

Who Should Read This

  • Medical billing staff
  • Coding professionals
  • Practice managers
  • Revenue cycle teams
  • Health plan operations staff
  • Clearinghouses and transaction vendors
  • Compliance staff

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Official DecisionHealth® Newsletter Archives includes:

  • Includes over 25,000 articles from:
    • Coder Pink Sheets
    • Part B News
    • Answer Books newsletters
  • Current newsletters added each quarter
  • Timely news and guidance vital for your practice
  • Fully searchable through Find-A-Code's Comprehensive Search
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to the Find-A-Code Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles
  • Save yourself tons of research time, find everything in one place!
Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • DecisionHealth Coding, Billing and Compliance Library

Related Articles

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?