decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2007 Issue 12 (December)
When to code signs and symptoms for diagnostic tests
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains diagnosis coding considerations for diagnostic testing when the final diagnosis is not yet confirmed at the time of the order or interpretation. It summarizes CMS and Medicare guidance on coding presenting signs and symptoms, distinguishing confirmed findings from suspected conditions, and documenting incidental or unrelated findings. The piece is useful for coders, billing staff, and physicians who order or interpret imaging and other diagnostic tests.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate diagnosis reporting for diagnostic tests affects claim support, compliance, and whether the documented reason for testing matches the reported diagnosis. Understanding the general CMS framework helps avoid unsupported diagnosis reporting while preserving clinically relevant findings from the encounter.
Article Sections
-
Signs and symptoms for diagnostic tests
Introduces the general approach to reporting the presenting reason for a diagnostic test when a definitive diagnosis has not been established. It discusses CMS guidance and the use of symptom-based documentation at a broad level.
-
When to report a diagnosis
Covers when a confirmed diagnosis may be reported in connection with diagnostic testing. The section explains the distinction between preliminary concern and verified findings.
-
Incidental diagnoses
Describes how additional findings discovered during testing are handled in relation to the primary reason for the exam. It also addresses broader considerations for secondary reporting in the diagnostic-test setting.
-
Resources
Lists CMS and Medicare reference materials cited by the article for further review. This section points readers to the underlying guidance documents discussed in the text.
What You Will Learn
- How diagnosis reporting is generally handled when a diagnostic test is ordered for an undetermined condition
- How confirmed findings differ from presenting signs or symptoms in the diagnostic-test setting
- How incidental or unrelated findings are treated in broad CMS guidance
- Which federal guidance sources the article cites for diagnostic-test coding
- How the article frames the role of symptoms, confirmed results, and secondary findings
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing and reimbursement staff
- Physicians who order diagnostic tests
- Physicians who interpret diagnostic tests
- Compliance staff
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com