E-prescribing, data exchange are part of HIT meaningful use

Why This Topic Matters

The article helps readers understand the policy context behind health IT incentive programs and the kinds of reporting and technology functions that were being used as benchmarks. That matters for practices trying to assess readiness for incentive participation and for teams tracking Medicare-related quality reporting initiatives.

Article Sections

1. Meaningful use and federal health IT incentives

   Introduces the incentive context for electronic health record adoption and the role of CMS in defining meaningful use. It frames the policy timeline and the broader health IT program environment.

2. Elements included in meaningful use

   Summarizes the general categories of functions and reporting expectations associated with meaningful use. It focuses on broad requirements tied to health IT adoption and data exchange.

3. E-prescribing programs and quality reporting measures

   Discusses the relationship between earlier Medicare quality reporting initiatives and electronic prescribing incentive efforts. It places these programs in the context of federal quality measurement.

4. Measure 124 and EHR reporting

   Describes a specific quality reporting measure tied to electronic health record adoption and how it could be reported. It also notes the general EHR capabilities referenced in connection with that measure.

5. Reporting performance and stakeholder views

   Reviews reported performance data and comments from policy stakeholders on the direction of the incentive program. It closes with perspectives on flexibility and participation in the program.