decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2005 Issue 10 (October)
Effort to collect clinical data likely to cost you money
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains a CMS initiative to turn clinical quality measures into HCPCS G codes for voluntary reporting and examines why physician organizations believe the approach could add cost and administrative burden to practices. It is relevant to physicians, medical group managers, and coding/billing staff who follow quality-reporting programs, CMS policy, and the operational impact of new reporting requirements. The article covers the proposed framework, stakeholder reactions, examples of the types of quality measures involved, and practice workflow concerns.
Why This Topic Matters
Quality-reporting programs can change documentation, billing workflows, and claim preparation. Understanding the policy direction and implementation concerns helps practices evaluate operational impact and monitor CMS developments.
What You Will Learn
- What CMS was proposing regarding quality-measure reporting
- Why physician and practice organizations raised concerns
- How quality reporting may affect billing and practice workflows
- What kinds of clinical measures were being discussed in the proposal
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical practice managers
- Coding and billing professionals
- Health policy staff
- Specialty society representatives
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com