decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2003 Issue 11 (November)
ESRD payments could be slowed when Medicare secondary payer
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers CMS changes affecting monthly ESRD management payments and the billing challenges that may arise when Medicare is secondary payer. It is relevant to nephrology practices, billing staff, and payers that process ESRD claims across primary and secondary insurance. The discussion includes CMS guidance gaps, HCPCS code-set changes, Medicare coordination of benefits, and possible policy responses from renal specialty groups and Congress.
Why This Topic Matters
Practices billing ESRD services need to understand how CMS code-set changes can affect claims when another insurer is primary, especially during Medicare’s secondary-payer period. The article helps readers assess whether their billing and payer workflows may be impacted by mismatched claim coding and evolving federal policy.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS ESRD payment policy changes may affect billing workflows
- Why secondary-payer claims can be vulnerable to coding mismatches
- What role HCPCS G codes play in ESRD payment policy
- How Medicare coordination of benefits can affect ESRD management claims
- What advocacy efforts are being discussed by renal specialty societies
Who Should Read This
- Nephrology practices
- Medical billing and coding professionals
- Revenue cycle staff
- Payer operations staff
- Compliance professionals
- Healthcare administrators
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com