decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2008 Issue 3 (March)
Interventional societies say new CCI directive is in ‘direct conflict’ with coding convention
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how several interventional specialty societies responded to a newly revised National Correct Coding Initiative policy manual directive affecting peripheral intervention reporting. It is relevant to cardiology, interventional radiology, vascular surgery, and coding compliance professionals who follow Medicare policy updates, AMA coding conventions, and coding guidance for endovascular procedures. The piece summarizes the nature of the dispute, the organizations involved, and why the change drew concern from the procedural coding community.
Why This Topic Matters
The article highlights a policy interpretation dispute that could affect how peripheral interventional services are reported and reimbursed under Medicare-related coding guidance. Readers who code or audit endovascular procedures may want to understand the scope of the controversy and the organizations involved.
What You Will Learn
- The policy issue prompting the professional society appeal
- Which specialty organizations objected to the directive
- How the dispute relates to Medicare coding guidance and AMA conventions
- Why the change raised concerns about reimbursement and reporting practices
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance professionals
- Interventional radiology staff
- Cardiology coding professionals
- Vascular surgery coding professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com