decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2001 Issue 10 (October)
Laboratories seek faster action on lessening LMRPs
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This piece explains why laboratories and physician offices have been concerned about inconsistent local medical review policies and how CMS has been trying to address the issue through national coverage activity and a pending rulemaking effort. It is relevant to lab administrators, physicians, billing and compliance professionals, and coding leaders who track Medicare coverage policy changes and their operational impact. The article also touches on comments and concerns from professional organizations about the pace and consistency of policy updates.
Why This Topic Matters
Variation in Medicare coverage policies can create administrative burden and uncertainty for laboratories, especially those serving patients across carrier jurisdictions. Understanding the policy process helps coding and compliance teams anticipate changes that may affect claim handling and coverage documentation.
Article Sections
-
CMS coverage process and laboratory policy changes
Introduces the Medicare coverage process and its use in addressing laboratory policy variation. Summarizes CMS statements about efforts to reduce the burden created by differing local policies.
-
Negotiated rulemaking and pending final rule
Describes the rulemaking activity tied to national policies for commonly performed laboratory tests. Notes the timeline and the broader policy context surrounding the pending final rule.
-
Concerns from laboratory advocates and specialty groups
Presents reactions from laboratory leaders and professional organizations regarding the pace of policy change. Highlights concerns about outdated local policies and the need for more timely updates.
-
Details of the problem
Explains the practical impact of variation in local coverage policies across carrier areas. Discusses how differing policy updates can affect laboratories operating near jurisdictional boundaries.
-
Professional society comments on LMRP maintenance
Summarizes comments from specialty organizations on the need for review and maintenance of local policies. Includes discussion of recommendations for periodic reaffirmation and deletion of outdated policies.
-
CMS next steps after the final rule
Outlines CMS’s stated plan to consider additional national or local coverage policies after the final rule is issued. Focuses on the agency’s ongoing approach to the issue.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS uses national coverage processes in relation to laboratory policy variation
- Why laboratories are concerned about differing local medical review policies
- What kinds of stakeholders commented on the issue
- What policy actions CMS indicated it may pursue next
Who Should Read This
- Laboratory administrators
- Physicians
- Medical coders
- Billing and reimbursement staff
- Compliance professionals
- Health policy analysts
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com