decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2007 Issue 8 (August)
E/M: How should family history make it into your documentation?; “Non-contributory” gray area creates confusion
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews a documentation issue in evaluation and management (E/M) services involving how family history and related history elements are recorded. It explains why the phrase “non-contributory” has created confusion, summarizes differing guidance from CMS and carriers, and discusses why the topic matters for coders, auditors, and physicians who document history components.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate history documentation can affect audit risk and the defensibility of E/M service records. This article is useful for practices trying to align physician documentation habits with payer expectations and internal compliance policies.
Article Sections
-
Non-contributory gray area creates confusion
Introduces the documentation concern and explains why the wording has raised questions among auditors and billing professionals. It also summarizes the general tension between agency guidance and carrier-level recommendations.
-
How to do it better
Provides broad documentation workflow suggestions for history-taking and recordkeeping. The section also notes the role of templates, questionnaires, and carrier-specific guidance.
What You Will Learn
- Why the phrase “non-contributory” has become controversial in E/M documentation
- How payer and carrier guidance can affect history documentation practices
- What general documentation approaches are discussed for family history and related history elements
- Why templates and structured questionnaires are relevant to this topic
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Clinical documentation staff
- Physicians and other providers
- Compliance and auditing professionals
- Medical practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com