decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2005 Issue 5 (May)
Make sure your audit is most relevant to your specialty
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how physician practices can make internal audits more relevant to their specialty by focusing on documentation patterns, diagnosis coding, medical necessity, and high-risk services identified through outside oversight resources. It is aimed at billing professionals, auditors, and practice managers who want to compare audit methods across specialties and understand why specialty-specific review matters for compliance and claim defensibility. The piece also includes a Medicare participation snapshot by specialty to provide broader context for the billing environment.
Why This Topic Matters
Specialty-focused auditing can help practices target their highest-risk billing areas, improve documentation quality, and better prepare for external review. The article also highlights how audit priorities may differ based on service mix, carrier scrutiny, and the specialty of the providers being reviewed.
Article Sections
-
Specialty-focused audit approach
Introduces the value of aligning audit methods with the clinical and billing patterns of a practice’s specialty. Discusses how audit scope and reviewer experience can affect internal compliance efforts.
-
Evaluation and management documentation review
Covers review of documentation for evaluation and management services using established guideline sets. Addresses the importance of consistency in audit approach and consideration of site-of-service differences.
-
Diagnosis coding and medical necessity
Explains why diagnosis coding review matters for some specialties and how supporting documentation and coverage expectations affect audit outcomes. Includes the role of carrier review and medical necessity considerations.
-
OIG work plan and high-risk services
Describes using annual oversight resources to identify services that may warrant closer audit attention. Emphasizes prioritizing areas with increased review activity.
-
Documentation-based auditing and auditor support
Focuses on evaluating claims only against what is documented and on supporting audit findings with evidence. Also discusses expectations for auditor experience and specialty familiarity.
-
Medicare par rates for 2005
Presents a table of Medicare participation rates by specialty and compares year-over-year figures. Includes source attribution and notes on specialty group composition.
What You Will Learn
- How specialty-specific audit planning can improve internal review processes
- Why evaluation and management documentation should be reviewed consistently
- How diagnosis code review and medical necessity issues affect claim auditing
- How oversight work plans can help identify higher-risk services
- Why documentation-only audit standards and evidence support matter
- How Medicare participation rates vary across specialties
Who Should Read This
- Physician practice managers
- Medical coders
- Billing staff
- Compliance auditors
- Revenue cycle professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com