decisionhealth Newsletters, Answer Books - 2009 Issue 3 (March)
Medical Specialties / Ophthalmology-Optometry / Advisory Opinion No. 98-18 - Ophthalmologist May Sublease Equipment to Optometrist Under Safe Harbor
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article reviews an OIG advisory opinion relevant to ophthalmology and optometry practices. It explains the context of a sublease arrangement for telecommunications equipment, the safe harbor framework discussed by the OIG, and the compliance concerns tied to referrals, marketing, fees, and related anti-kickback issues. The piece is useful for providers, compliance staff, and coding/billing professionals who need to understand the regulatory and business-relationship aspects of telemedicine-related arrangements.
Why This Topic Matters
Healthcare organizations and practitioners involved in ophthalmology, optometry, and telemedicine may need to evaluate business arrangements for fraud-and-abuse risk. This article helps readers understand the type of oversight and safeguards highlighted in an OIG advisory opinion.
What You Will Learn
- How an OIG advisory opinion can address a sublease arrangement between eye-care providers
- What general compliance factors are discussed in relation to telemedicine consultations
- Why referral relationships, marketing, and fee arrangements matter in the advisory opinion context
- How the article frames the relationship between a safe harbor analysis and anti-kickback concerns
Who Should Read This
- Ophthalmologists
- Optometrists
- Practice managers
- Healthcare compliance professionals
- Medical billing and coding professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com