decisionhealth Newsletters, Answer Books - 2009 Issue 3 (March)
Medicare Contractor Role in Fraud Enforcement / Contractor Benefit Integrity Units / Investigation of Complaints / Complaints Involving NIPs / Strong Potential for Fraud
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers Medicare contractor fraud-enforcement procedures and the role of OIG in reviewing complaints that may indicate a strong potential for fraud. It is aimed at coding, compliance, and program integrity professionals who need a high-level understanding of contractor review standards, beneficiary-contact evidence, and referral considerations. The discussion focuses on general investigative criteria and oversight responsibilities rather than billing guidance or code selection.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding how contractors identify and escalate suspected fraud helps compliance teams, auditors, and billing stakeholders interpret program integrity reviews and complaint-based investigations.
What You Will Learn
- How Medicare contractors assess complaint-based indicators of possible fraud
- What types of beneficiary statements may support a referral for further review
- How contractor and OIG responsibilities differ in fraud investigation oversight
- What general factors guide expanded review in suspected fraud cases
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Compliance officers
- Billing managers
- Healthcare auditors
- Program integrity staff
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com