Medicare postpones controversial ‘anti-markup’ provision ‘til 2009

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Note:  The following article synopsis was NOT provided by HCPro. It was created by Find-A-Code/innoviHealth.

Article Overview

This article explains a Medicare rule change affecting physician practices and diagnostic imaging payment policy, with emphasis on the postponement of most of the anti-markup provision until 2009. It is relevant to orthopedic and other physician practices, billing staff, and coding/compliance professionals who track CMS rules, physician fee schedule updates, and related payment policy guidance.

Why This Topic Matters

The article matters because it summarizes a CMS delay in implementing a payment-policy change that could affect how physician practices bill for diagnostic imaging and other services. Readers following Medicare compliance and practice reimbursement updates need to know which parts were postponed, which remained effective, and that CMS planned additional guidance.

Article Sections

  1. Medicare postpones anti-markup provision

    Introduces the CMS decision to delay most of the rule and notes the timeframe referenced in the final rule. The section frames the impact on physician practices and billing concerns.

  2. Portions that remained in effect

    Summarizes the limited parts of the policy that continued to apply and identifies the general categories of services affected. The section focuses on what the postponement did not change.

  3. Why practices objected

    Describes the concerns raised by physician groups about how the revised policy could affect imaging services at different practice locations. It also notes CMS’s stated concerns about clarity in the rule language.

  4. What comes next

    Outlines the agency’s plan to study the issue further and consider future clarifying guidance or additional rulemaking. This section points to possible follow-up actions from CMS.

What You Will Learn

  • The scope of a Medicare policy delay affecting physician practices
  • Which broad categories of services were still subject to the policy
  • Why the rule drew objections from physician groups
  • What CMS indicated it might do next to address the issue

Who Should Read This

  • Physician practices
  • Orthopedic practices
  • Medical coders
  • Billing staff
  • Compliance professionals
  • Revenue cycle teams

Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.

Official DecisionHealth® Newsletter Archives includes:

  • Includes over 25,000 articles from:
    • Coder Pink Sheets
    • Part B News
    • Answer Books newsletters
  • Current newsletters added each quarter
  • Timely news and guidance vital for your practice
  • Fully searchable through Find-A-Code's Comprehensive Search
  • Codes mentioned in articles are linked to the Find-A-Code Code Information pages
  • Code Information pages link back to related articles
  • Save yourself tons of research time, find everything in one place!
Access to this feature is available in the following products:
  • DecisionHealth Coding, Billing and Compliance Library

Related Articles

Articles are listed in order of calculated relevance.

demo
request yours today
subscribe
start today
newsletter
free subscription

Thank you for choosing Find-A-Code, please Sign In to remove ads.

Aimee- AI -powered coding assistant - Try it now for Free Would you like Aimee - AI
to help you with this?