MGMA: Proposed meaningful use criteria demands too much, too soon

Why This Topic Matters

The article helps readers gauge whether their current EHR setup is likely to align with CMS’s proposed standards and highlights the operational and financial implications of pursuing compliance under a rapidly evolving federal timeline.

Article Sections

1. Proposed meaningful use rule overview

   Summarizes the CMS proposal and the broader context for the meaningful use framework. It introduces the general expectations placed on providers seeking incentive eligibility.

2. EHR capability gaps and patient access concerns

   Describes concerns that existing EHR systems may not support all proposed requirements. It discusses the general issue of patient access and electronic information availability.

3. Practice reaction

   Presents a physician practice administrator’s perspective on adopting a certified EHR and the challenges posed by the proposed rule. It focuses on readiness, upgrades, and implementation burden.

4. The time element

   Addresses the timeline for demonstrating meaningful use and the proposed performance period. It explains why the schedule is viewed as a major operational consideration.

5. Bottom line

   Closes with the MGMA’s overall reaction and planned response to the proposed rule. It highlights the organization’s intent to comment on the draft requirements.