decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2016 Issue 5 (May)
MIPS and APMs offer mutually exclusive reporting, payment tracks
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers Medicare’s newer reimbursement framework for physicians and practices, focusing on the relationship between the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and advanced alternative payment models (APMs). It explains the broad structure of the two tracks, why participation in one affects the other, and how the choice may matter for organizations such as accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes. The piece is relevant to clinicians, practice administrators, and health policy readers trying to understand the general reporting and payment landscape created under MACRA and CMS guidance.
Why This Topic Matters
Understanding the separation between MIPS and advanced APM participation is important because it affects reporting obligations, payment opportunities, and strategic participation decisions under Medicare’s value-based reimbursement framework.
What You Will Learn
- How Medicare’s quality-reporting and payment tracks are organized at a high level
- Why advanced APM participation and MIPS participation are presented as separate options
- What kinds of provider organizations are discussed in connection with the advanced APM track
- How the article frames the general payment implications of choosing one track over the other
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Medical practice administrators
- Health policy professionals
- Quality reporting staff
- Value-based care participants
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com