decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2014 Issue 6 (June)
New modifier 59 guidance suggests crackdown, offers clues to beat it
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains recent CMS attention to modifier 59 and summarizes commentary from coding consultants and clinicians on the kinds of scenarios that have been highlighted in the updated guidance. It is aimed at coders, auditors, and revenue cycle staff who need to follow Medicare-related compliance updates and understand the broader context of multi-site and bundled-service reporting. The discussion focuses on general themes in the guidance, the scrutiny surrounding modifier usage, and the types of specialty situations being discussed without replacing the underlying premium analysis.
Why This Topic Matters
Modifier 59 remains a frequent audit target, so updated CMS commentary can affect compliance risk, claim review priorities, and how practices evaluate their own reporting patterns.
Article Sections
-
CMS guidance and non-contiguous sites
This section discusses updated CMS materials and the general issue of multi-site procedures, including how non-contiguous locations are being addressed in the context of modifier 59.
-
Examples involving podiatry and other procedures
This section reviews specialty-specific examples used to illustrate the kinds of procedural combinations and anatomical scenarios being discussed in the guidance.
-
Scrutiny of 59 ramps up
This section covers the broader compliance environment, including contractor attention, work plan focus, and the audit concerns associated with modifier usage.
-
Practical review considerations by specialty
This section offers general commentary on reviewing modifier use within different specialties and the kinds of workflow or auditing resources that may affect compliance efforts.
What You Will Learn
- How recent CMS guidance is shaping discussion of modifier 59
- Why multi-site and bundled-service scenarios are drawing attention
- What kinds of specialty situations are commonly reviewed in modifier 59 audits
- How payer scrutiny can affect practice-level compliance processes
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Compliance staff
- Practice managers
- Revenue cycle professionals
- Physician practices
Codes Discussed
Modifiers Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com