decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2006 Issue 4 (April)
OIG hammers consults; 4 tips to bill them correctly
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article examines a federal review of consultation billing errors and discusses why consult claims were frequently miscoded or unsupported by documentation. It is intended for coders, billing staff, compliance teams, and clinicians who document and report evaluation and management services. The piece also references CMS guidance and Medicare manual updates affecting consult coding and documentation practices.
Why This Topic Matters
Consult billing remains a high-risk area for compliance, reimbursement accuracy, and audit exposure. Understanding the reporting issues highlighted in the article can help organizations strengthen documentation processes and stay aligned with current CMS guidance.
Article Sections
-
Report findings and billing error patterns
Summarizes the OIG review, including the scope of the analysis and the types of consultation billing problems identified. The section also notes the financial impact of the reported errors.
-
Tip 1: Documentation expectations for higher-level consults
Addresses documentation elements discussed in connection with more complex consultation services. The section focuses on the kinds of clinical record components emphasized by the article.
-
Tip 2: Supporting family history documentation
Explains a documentation reminder strategy for providers and highlights the importance of capturing family history information. The section discusses practical documentation awareness for consult reporting.
-
Tip 3: Reviewing PFSH when it is non-contributory
Covers how the article describes documenting review of past, family, and social history even when it does not affect the current management question. The section presents wording guidance at a broad level.
-
Tip 4: What distinguishes a consult from another E/M service
Describes the broad characteristics the article associates with a consultation and how those services differ from other evaluation and management encounters. The section also references written reporting back to the requesting provider.
-
Additional OIG results and CMS references
Provides additional summary statistics from the OIG review and notes related CMS and Medicare manual references. The section places the consult issue in a broader compliance and policy context.
What You Will Learn
- The main consultation billing problems highlighted by the OIG review
- How the article frames documentation concerns for consult services
- Why family history and PFSH documentation are emphasized
- How the article distinguishes consults from other evaluation and management services
- Which CMS and Medicare references are mentioned in connection with consult policy updates
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Billing and reimbursement staff
- Compliance professionals
- Physicians and non-physician practitioners
- Practice managers
- Revenue cycle teams
Codes Discussed
Code Ranges Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com