decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2005 Issue 10 (October)
P4P will fail with no RBRVS changes, says one former CMS topsider
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This premium article examines debate over Medicare pay-for-performance proposals and the need, in the view of a former CMS official, to address perceived weaknesses in the resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) at the same time. It is relevant to readers tracking Medicare physician payment policy, RBRVS valuation oversight, and the roles of CMS, the AMA, and advisory bodies in the review process.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand why some policy experts believe payment reform can be incomplete if underlying physician valuation processes are not also updated. The article is useful for those following Medicare payment methodology, policy testimony, and the organizations involved in relative value review.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames the relationship between pay-for-performance policy and RBRVS reform.
- What general concerns are raised about oversight of physician relative value setting.
- Which organizations and advisory processes are discussed in the context of Medicare payment policy.
- What role prior reviews and recommendations play in the broader debate over valuation oversight.
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding managers
- Physician practice administrators
- Health policy analysts
- Medicare reimbursement specialists
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com