PQRI providers rely on EHR, other measures for bonuses

Why This Topic Matters

PQRI participation depends on accurate quality reporting, and the article helps readers understand the reporting areas that were driving volume, the CMS resources tied to measure submission, and which program changes could affect future reporting opportunities.

Article Sections

1. PQRI reporting trends and major reporting areas

   The opening discussion summarizes reporting volume trends and identifies the broad quality measure categories that accounted for a large share of submissions. It also introduces the reporting year context and the CMS program framework.

2. Program updates and reporting resources

   This section discusses CMS proposed changes affecting future PQRI participation and points readers to program materials that support measure reporting. It also references where official release information can be found.

3. CMS findings on reporting accuracy

   The article describes a CMS report on correct versus incorrect reporting for a specific measure and notes the role of invalid encounters in errors. It also mentions that the underlying measure materials list eligible procedure groupings.

4. Top 12 reported PQRI data codes in 2009

   A table presents the most frequently billed quality data codes, associated measures, and the specialties most commonly billing them. The source note at the end comments on shared tracking codes used across more than one measure.