decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2006 Issue 2 (February)
Practices, doctors question AMA pay-for-performance deal
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article covers early reactions to an AMA pay-for-performance agreement from physicians, coding and practice management professionals, and a political consultant. It places the discussion in the context of CMS quality reporting activity, specialty society involvement, and broader Medicare payment policy debates. The piece is useful for readers tracking physician quality reporting initiatives, practice administration concerns, and how professional organizations and federal policy may intersect.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand the policy and operational concerns surrounding physician quality reporting initiatives, including how practices may be affected by reporting requirements, workflow burden, and Medicare payment discussions.
What You Will Learn
- How physicians and practice staff are reacting to an AMA pay-for-performance agreement
- What broad CMS quality reporting activity is being discussed in connection with the agreement
- Why practice administrators and coding staff are concerned about workflow and implementation burden
- How the discussion is connected to broader Medicare payment policy and physician group compliance concerns
Who Should Read This
- Physicians
- Practice managers
- Medical coders
- Billing and compliance staff
- Healthcare policy professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com