decisionhealth Newsletters, Part B News - 2010 Issue 1 (January)
Proposed meaningful use requirements by difficulty, part II
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article examines a later set of proposed meaningful use requirements and places them in a difficulty ranking based on EHR capability, workflow impact, and implementation uncertainty. It is aimed at healthcare organizations, clinicians, EHR users, and coding or compliance professionals who want a high-level view of the proposed electronic health record expectations discussed in the rulemaking period.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers gauge which proposed EHR-related requirements were viewed as easier or harder to implement and why those differences mattered for practices preparing for meaningful use participation.
Article Sections
-
Difficulty rankings
Introduces the ranking scheme used to compare the proposed requirements and explains the criteria behind the difficulty scale.
-
Requirements and analyses
Reviews the individual proposed meaningful use requirements and summarizes the broad implementation considerations discussed for each one.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames difficulty rankings for proposed meaningful use requirements
- What broad categories of EHR functionality are covered in the review
- Which general implementation factors were considered in the comparison
- How the article situates the requirements within early meaningful use planning
Who Should Read This
- Healthcare compliance professionals
- Medical coders and auditors
- Practice managers
- EHR implementation teams
- Physicians and other eligible professionals
- Health IT and revenue cycle professionals
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com