Proposed quality payment rule could create snares for EHR quality reporters

Why This Topic Matters

Clinicians and practices using EHR-based quality reporting need to understand how measure availability and version currency can affect whether they receive full credit under the proposed rule. The article helps readers assess whether their systems and reporting workflows are ready for current quality-reporting expectations.

Article Sections

1. Quality Payment Program proposal and EHR quality reporting

   Introduces the proposed quality-reporting expectations under the Quality Payment Program and the role of EHR-based quality measures. It outlines the general reporting context for clinicians and practices.

2. Measure availability and reporting limitations

   Discusses situations where an EHR may not contain enough applicable measures to satisfy reporting needs. It also notes the need to consider other reporting approaches when EHR coverage is limited.

3. Electronic clinical quality measure version concerns

   Focuses on the issue of outdated measure versions in EHR systems and why version alignment matters during the performance period. It emphasizes the importance of confirming vendor support for current measure updates.

4. Vendor review and reporting alternatives

   Covers the recommendation to verify EHR vendor capabilities and explore alternative reporting methods if updates are unavailable. It also points readers toward related educational resources.