decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2022 Issue 12 (December)
Q&A: New Cat III code 0737T likely not appropriate for BEAR implant reporting
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article addresses a coding and reimbursement question involving bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) and the reporting of an associated implant. It is aimed at coding professionals, authorization staff, and others involved in orthopedic procedure billing. The discussion compares the BEAR implant with broader CPT Category III guidance and references FDA and orthopedic literature for context.
Why This Topic Matters
It helps readers understand why this orthopedic implant question matters for procedure coding, authorization review, and patient cost inquiries without separately exposing the premium coding guidance.
Article Sections
-
Question
The reader asks about reporting BEAR-related ACL repair and whether a separate code exists for the implant. The question also raises an authorization and cost inquiry.
-
Answer
The response discusses the general coding treatment of materials used in ACL repair and compares the BEAR implant to other implant categories. It also points to the relevant CPT Category III context.
-
Description of Procedure for 0737T
An excerpted procedure description from a CPT source is provided to show the clinical setting associated with the referenced Category III code. The passage outlines the broader surgical context without focusing on the specific coding outcome.
-
By contrast
This section contrasts the BEAR implant with the procedure and context associated with the referenced Category III code. It also cites manufacturer, FDA, and journal context for the implant.
-
Resources
Source links are listed for the FDA release and orthopedic journal article cited in the discussion.
What You Will Learn
- How the article frames a BEAR implant coding question in orthopedic ACL repair
- What general sources are referenced for context on the implant and related CPT guidance
- Why the article compares the implant with a Category III code discussion
- What types of supporting references are cited for further reading
Who Should Read This
- Medical coders
- Coding auditors
- Orthopedic billing staff
- Prior authorization teams
- Revenue cycle professionals
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com