decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2017 Issue 12 (December)
Quality Payment Program final rule: In surprise move, CMS introduces cost into 2018 MIPS performance year
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article explains how CMS’s final rule changes the Quality Payment Program for year two of the MIPS era. It summarizes the updated performance-category weighting, reporting expectations, CEHRT options, low-volume exemption changes, and the general direction of cost measurement. The piece is relevant to clinicians, practice managers, and coding/reimbursement staff who track Medicare quality reporting requirements and payment adjustments.
Why This Topic Matters
The rule affects how clinicians are scored under Medicare’s quality program and what practices need to monitor for payment impact. It also signals which reporting areas and cost measures are becoming more important for future performance years.
Article Sections
-
QPP replaced the SGR
Explains the program’s place in Medicare quality reporting and how it relates to earlier reporting programs. Also introduces the broader categories that make up the current framework.
-
MIPS ramps up the challenges
Summarizes the main performance-year changes affecting participation, scoring, thresholds, payment adjustments, and reporting periods. This section provides a high-level view of the updated MIPS structure.
-
EHR reporting category gets easier
Covers updates related to electronic health record technology and the advancing care information category. It also notes how the rule affects technology options and related scoring opportunities.
-
Look for 3 new musculoskeletal quality measures
Describes additions and changes in the quality category, with attention to musculoskeletal reporting and measure maintenance. It also notes measures that are losing prominence under the program.
-
See if you are exempt
Summarizes participation exceptions and the revised low-volume threshold. This section focuses on who may be excluded from the reporting requirements.
-
Pay attention to cost
Reviews the return of the cost category and its broader significance within MIPS scoring. It also explains why practices are being advised to monitor cost data more closely.
-
2 cost measures on the docket
Introduces the cost measures identified in the rule and discusses attribution and data review at a general level. It also mentions future potential expansion of cost measurement.
-
MIPS performance scores
Presents a summary chart comparing category weights across performance years. The table highlights how the MIPS score distribution changes over time.
What You Will Learn
- How CMS updated the Quality Payment Program final rule for the 2018 performance year
- How MIPS category weighting changed under the final rule
- What types of reporting and technology requirements were discussed
- Which broad quality and cost topics were emphasized for Medicare clinicians
- How the rule affects participation thresholds and exemption considerations
- What general cost-reporting areas CMS highlighted for future monitoring
Who Should Read This
- Physicians and other MIPS-eligible clinicians
- Practice managers
- Medical coders and reimbursement staff
- Quality reporting and compliance teams
- Healthcare consultants
Codes Discussed
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com