Quality reporting: Look to registry reporting now; be ready when CMS releases the 2016 list

Why This Topic Matters

Quality reporting can affect payment adjustments for physician groups, so choosing and preparing for the right reporting method has financial implications. Understanding registry options and CMS approval timing helps practices reduce the risk of missed reporting requirements.

Article Sections

1. PQRS and quality reporting pressure in 2016

   Introduces the reporting environment for physician practices and why quality reporting choices matter for Medicare reimbursement. Summarizes the shift in program expectations and the general implications for groups and individual providers.

2. Understand the 2 types of registries

   Defines the two registry categories discussed in the article and compares their general reporting roles. Also notes how each type fits into broader CMS quality reporting options.

3. Qualified registry

   Covers the general characteristics of one registry category, including the kinds of CMS-approved measures it can support and the practical considerations involved in using it. The section also addresses reporting scope and operational setup at a high level.

4. Qualified clinical data registry

   Describes the second registry category and how it differs from the first in broad reporting capability. The section outlines the general measure categories and patient-reporting expectations associated with this option.

5. Think about registries now

   Explains why practices should review registry options before CMS publishes the annual approval list. Highlights timing, vendor reapplication, and the need to evaluate available registry choices in advance.