decisionhealth Newsletters, Coder Pink Sheets - 2008 Issue 1 (January)
Review of systems key to reporting top visit, consult codes
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.
Article Overview
This article discusses the role of review of systems documentation in supporting higher-level evaluation and management history requirements for new patient visits and consultations. It compares CPT guidance with Medicare’s numeric approach, explains the distinction between ROS, physical examination, and past medical history, and covers practical documentation considerations for ObGyn practices. The piece is aimed at coders, billers, and clinicians who document E/M histories and want to understand how ROS depth affects visit leveling.
Why This Topic Matters
Accurate review of systems documentation can determine whether a history supports a higher-level visit or consultation, making the topic important for compliant E/M reporting and documentation quality.
Article Sections
-
History requirements for higher-level visits and consultations
Explains how the depth of history documentation relates to evaluation and management visit levels in an ObGyn setting. Introduces the role of review of systems in supporting different history levels.
-
CPT and Medicare approaches to review of systems
Summarizes how CPT and Medicare frame review of systems documentation and how those frameworks relate to history categories. Discusses the general documentation expectations referenced in the article.
-
Example of documented systems
Provides a sample set of body systems documented in an office note. The example illustrates the kind of information discussed in relation to review of systems documentation.
-
What is the Review of Systems?
Defines the purpose of review of systems in the history component and explains its general clinical role. Covers why ROS is used during patient evaluation and planning.
-
It's not the exam
Distinguishes review of systems from the physical examination portion of an encounter. Emphasizes that these are separate components of evaluation and management documentation.
-
Or the patient's past medical history
Addresses the difference between review of systems and past medical history. Clarifies the broader documentation context for patient history elements.
-
All other system negative acceptable
Discusses a shorthand documentation approach described in the article for systems not otherwise noted. Covers when this type of notation is presented as acceptable in the article's discussion.
-
Documentation tip: Hand out a questionnaire
Offers a practical documentation workflow using patient questionnaires and brief physician review. Focuses on gathering history information efficiently in the office setting.
What You Will Learn
- How review of systems contributes to evaluation and management history levels
- How CPT and Medicare differ in describing review of systems depth
- How ROS differs from the physical exam and past medical history
- What types of documentation practices are discussed for office encounters
- Why ROS documentation matters for ObGyn visit reporting
Who Should Read This
- ObGyn physicians
- Medical coders
- Medical billers
- E/M documentation staff
- Practice managers
Subscribe or sign in to view the full article.


Quick, Current, Complete - www.findacode.com